Spanish Man Faces 2 Year Prison Sentence for Opening Letter Addressed to His Son

【吸收财讯】升困井革鼎震继 -> 世界在你眼前!

一名西班牙男子因打开一封写给他10岁儿子的信,并将其作为对该男孩母亲的审判的证据,冒着在接下来两年的牢狱生活中度过的风险。

在星期三在西班牙塞维利亚市举行的听证会上,一位父亲被指控打开一封写给他的信,侵犯了他的孩子的隐私,但他没有得到授权。这封信是男孩的外祖母寄来的,信中他被告知,在2012年由他自己的妻子,男孩的母亲,对被告提起的家庭虐待案中,他应该如何证明他父亲有罪。据报道,孩子的姑妈在信中还侮辱了他的父亲,然后被告在法庭上用信证明他妻子的家人强迫他的儿子作证。他在那起案件中被判无罪,但现在因违反私人通信而面临两年监禁和经济赔偿。

A Spanish man risks spending the next two years in prison for opening a letter addressed to his 10-year-old son and using it as evidence in a trial against the boy’s mother.

In a hearing held on Wednesday in the Spanish city of Seville, a father was accused by the prosecution of violating his child’s privacy by opening a letter addressed to him, which he was not authorized to do. The letter had been sent by the boy’s maternal aunt, and in it he was told how he should testify against his father in a 2012 domestic abuse case brought against the defendant by his own wife, the boy’s mother. The child’s aunt reportedly also insulted his father in the letter, which was then used by the defendant in court to prove that his wife’s family had coerced his son to testify against him. He was acquitted in that case, but now faces a two-year prison sentence and financial compensation for violating private correspondence.

Man Faces Two-Year Prison Sentence for Opening Letter Addressed to His 10-Year-Old Son

Photo: jackmac34/Pixabay

It was the boy’s mother who took legal action against her former husband, accusing him of reading and publicly disclosing private information. Through her lawyers, the woman asked for a two-year prison sentence and compensation amounting to 3,000 euros ($3,340). La Vanguardia reports that the woman’s lawyers also asked that the man pay her client an additional 6 euros per day for 12 months, a total of 2,160 euros, but the reason is not specified.

In his defense, the father’s attorneys claimed that he had opened the letter by accident, because he shares the same first nae as his son. Furthermore, even if that hadn’t been the case, the defense argues that by opening the letter, the man simply exercised parental authority, which he was perfectly entitled to do.

For its part, the Office of the Prosecutor asked that the defendant be acquitted in this case, arguing that it agrees that he had exercised parental authority over the minor. However, the judge presiding over the case has yet to make a final ruling.



相关推荐